Federal Government Clarifies Provosts’ Tenure Rules Under New Colleges of Education Act

The Federal Ministry of Education has provided a detailed clarification regarding the implementation of the Federal Colleges of Education Act, 2023, particularly in relation to the tenure of Provosts.

google.com, pub-3822032484198406, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

This comes in response to a letter from the Joint Action Committee (JAC) of Staff Unions of the Federal College of Education (Technical), Akoka, dated April 8, 2024, which requested clarity to avoid potential crises in the sector.

According to a statement issued by the Ministry’s Legal Unit on May 23, 2024, the amended Act stipulates a single, non-renewable five-year term for Provosts of Federal Colleges of Education. This provision is aimed at standardizing tenure across institutions and ensuring a clear succession plan.

Key highlights of the Ministry’s statement:

– Section 13(6) of the amended Act limits Provosts to a single term of five years, with no possibility of renewal.

– Transitional arrangements under Section 13(7) address the status of Provosts appointed before the Act was enacted:

– Provosts with less than five years in office will serve a single term of five years, regardless of their original appointment terms.

– Provosts serving a second term at the time the Act was enacted will complete their current four-year term without any extension.

– For Provosts who had not completed their first four-year term before the Act’s enactment, an additional year is added to make it a five-year term, with no option for renewal.

– Provosts re-appointed for a second four-year term before the Act’s commencement will complete this term as their final one, without transitioning to a five-year term.

The Ministry emphasized that these measures are intended to uphold justice and equity by allowing Provosts to complete their appointed terms without disruption. The clear language of the Act reflects the legislative intent to provide stability and prevent ambiguity in leadership transitions within the Colleges of Education.

The Ministry referenced a Supreme Court ruling in Olofu v. Itodo (2010), which underscores the importance of interpreting statutes according to their plain and ordinary meaning. This principle has guided the Ministry’s interpretation of the new provisions.

The Ministry encourages any unresolved issues or grievances regarding these provisions to be directed to the Governing Council of the respective institutions for further consideration. The Federal Ministry of Education commended the Joint Action Committee for its efforts to maintain a peaceful industrial environment and reiterated its commitment to enforcing the Federal Colleges of Education Act, 2023, and other relevant regulations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *